| vs ATL | vs NE | vs SE | vs CEN | vs NW | vs PAC | |||||||||||||
| Eastern Conference | W | L | OL | W | L | OL | W | L | OL | W | L | OL | W | L | OL | W | L | OL |
| ATLANTIC | x | x | x | 90 | 88 | 22 | 96 | 75 | 29 | 24 | 18 | 8 | 12 | 11 | 2 | 11 | 12 | 2 |
| NORTHEAST | 110 | 64 | 26 | x | x | x | 117 | 68 | 15 | 12 | 9 | 4 | 24 | 23 | 3 | 11 | 10 | 4 |
| SOUTHEAST | 104 | 75 | 21 | 83 | 97 | 20 | x | x | x | 19 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 13 | 6 | 20 | 26 | 4 |
| vs ATL | vs NE | vs SE | vs CEN | vs NW | vs PAC | |||||||||||||
| Western Conference | W | L | OL | W | L | OL | W | L | OL | W | L | OL | W | L | OL | W | L | OL |
| CENTRAL | 26 | 16 | 8 | 13 | 10 | 2 | 6 | 13 | 6 | x | x | x | 94 | 79 | 27 | 89 | 91 | 20 |
| NORTHWEST | 13 | 7 | 5 | 26 | 17 | 7 | 19 | 5 | 1 | 106 | 75 | 19 | x | x | x | 102 | 74 | 24 |
| PACIFIC | 14 | 7 | 4 | 14 | 9 | 2 | 30 | 16 | 4 | 111 | 70 | 19 | 98 | 84 | 18 | x | x | x |
Using the NHL's formula for standings points - 2 points for a win and 1 point for an over time loss here is the combined totals:
| Vs League | ||||
| Eastern Conference | W | L | OL | PTS |
| ATLANTIC | 233 | 204 | 63 | 529 |
| NORTHEAST | 274 | 174 | 52 | 600 |
| SOUTHEAST | 232 | 214 | 54 | 518 |
| Vs League | ||||
| Western Conference | W | L | OL | PTS |
| CENTRAL | 228 | 209 | 63 | 519 |
| NORTHWEST | 266 | 178 | 56 | 588 |
| PACIFIC | 267 | 186 | 47 | 581 |
So here is the the rankings for NHL's Toughest Division to Play:
| Rank | Division | |||||||
| 1 | NORTHEAST | |||||||
| 2 | NORTHWEST | |||||||
| 3 | PACIFIC | |||||||
| 4 | ATLANTIC | |||||||
| 5 | CENTRAL | |||||||
| 6 | SOUTHEAST | |||||||
One last thing, thanks to The Puck Stops Here for helping me out with my incredible math skills and allowing me to make this post as accurate as possible.